From the desk of Scott Covert | AI-Stocks Intelligence | April 2026
I built something that is. Here's the story.
Dear Friend,
Let me say something that might surprise you, coming from a guy who's about to sell you an investment research report:
Most Wall Street analysts are smarter than me.
I mean that. Many of them have 20 IQ points on me, easy. They have Harvard MBAs. They have Bloomberg terminals that cost $24,000 a year. They have teams of researchers, decades of experience, and institutional knowledge that I will never match.
And yet...
In 2024, three of the most respected analysts in the world got spectacularly, publicly, career-damagingly wrong about what was happening in the market.
Not because they were stupid.
Because their tools weren't built for what's happening right now.
Marko Kolanovic, JPMorgan's Chief Global Markets Strategist
Set a year-end 2024 S&P 500 target of 4,200. Doubled down in June, warning the S&P would "plummet 23%" by December.
The S&P closed 2024 at 5,881. A 23% gain.
His target was off by 1,681 points — 40% too low. After 19 years at JPMorgan, Kolanovic left the firm in July 2024. Fortune's headline: "Marko Kolanovic out of a job at JPMorgan after predicting U.S. recession that never happened."
Mike Wilson, Morgan Stanley's Chief U.S. Equity Strategist
Set a year-end 2024 target of 4,500. Told investors to diversify away from the Magnificent Seven. As late as March 2024, he "saw no reason to raise" his target while every other major bank revised upward.
The S&P closed at 5,881. The Mag 7 delivered a 65% return.
Wilson finally capitulated in May, raising to 5,400 — still 8% below reality. Two consecutive years of flagship calls that cost Morgan Stanley clients massive opportunity.
Pierre Ferragu, New Street Research
On July 5, 2024, issued one of the rarest downgrades on Wall Street: NVIDIA from Buy to Neutral. His reasoning: the stock was "fully valued" and "for the first time, we think Nvidia might not exceed expectations."
NVIDIA hit $148 in November — an 18% surge after his downgrade — and closed the year up 171%. Dan Ives of Wedbush publicly countered: "Cannot disagree more."
Now here's what I want you to understand:
I am not calling these people dumb. They are, by any measure, among the sharpest analytical minds in finance. Kolanovic was one of JPMorgan's most senior strategists. Wilson is one of the most-watched voices on Wall Street. Ferragu built his career on semiconductor analysis.
So what went wrong?
Here's the structural problem, and it's not their fault:
Wall Street analysts are evaluated on 12-month price targets. Their bosses want quarterly earnings estimates. Their clients want to know what happens before the next fund rebalancing cycle. They're built to look 1 year out, max.
Their models are calibrated on historical patterns — interest rate cycles, earnings multiples, sector rotation data going back decades. Mean reversion. Regression to trend. The stuff that worked brilliantly for 50 years.
And then AI showed up.
Not as a product to analyze. As a force that changes how every other product, company, and industry works.
Kolanovic's quant framework couldn't account for AI as a deflationary force that extended the economic cycle. Wilson's valuation models flagged AI stocks as "overvalued" because they weighed P/E ratios — but AI capex creates its own demand in a self-reinforcing loop that traditional metrics label as a bubble. Ferragu applied the semiconductor cycle framework (demand peaks, supply catches up, margins compress) to an infrastructure buildout that doesn't follow semiconductor cycles at all — it follows a curve more like the internet backbone buildout of the late 1990s.
Same tools. Same frameworks. Same institutional pressures.
Completely different era.
And here's the part that really matters for your portfolio:
AI doesn't just give us better tools to analyze industries. AI is the reason those industries are reshuffling in the first place. The same technology that lets me build a cross-sector analysis engine is the technology that's rewriting the economics of every business on Earth.
The tool and the disruption are the same thing.
That's what I built my engine around.
Over the last 8 months, I built a proprietary engine that models how AI redistributes the relative value of 28 industries across five timeframes: 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years.
Why 28? Because the standard 25-industry model that Wall Street uses lumps together businesses that AI affects in completely opposite ways.
Take semiconductors. TSMC builds the physical chips. Billion-dollar factories. The constraint is the laws of physics. Three to four years to build one new plant.
NVIDIA designs the architecture of those chips — using AI to design AI chips. Pure intellectual property. Software-like margins. NVIDIA is now 20 times more valuable than IBM was in 1985, with one-tenth the employees.
Treating those as "the same industry" is like averaging a sprinter and a marathon runner and calling the result useful.
So we split three industries into six:
25 became 28. A small change that produced dramatically different investment conclusions.
Then we mapped 167 cross-sector cascade effects — the specific, documented mechanisms by which AI adoption in one industry ripples into others.
And then I wrote it all down in a book that any self-directed investor can read and use immediately.
This is a 23,000+ word research report that covers every industry AI will touch — and explains exactly what AI does to each one, when it hits, and what it means for stock valuations.
For each of the 28 industries, you get:
This is the part that tends to change how people think about their portfolio.
Most analysis looks at each industry in isolation. "AI is good for software. AI is bad for media." End of story.
That's like saying a hurricane only affects the beach it hits.
In reality, every AI disruption in one industry cascades into others. Our engine maps 167 of these connections. Here are some that will make you rethink your holdings:
You cannot make intelligent investment decisions without understanding these connections.
And this is exactly where traditional analysis falls short. The analysts aren't tracking cross-sector cascades because their coverage is siloed: the semiconductor analyst covers semiconductors, the healthcare analyst covers healthcare. Nobody's job is to model how a chip breakthrough in Taiwan reshapes hospital economics in Ohio.
That's what the engine does. And that's what this book explains.
The #1 question isn't "will AI affect my industry?" Everyone knows the answer is yes.
The question is: "WHEN?"
Chapter 27 walks you through what happens at each timeframe:
This is where the 1-year analytical horizon becomes a real liability. If your research only tells you what happens this quarter, you're flying blind on the structural shift that determines whether an entire sector exists in ten years.
Look, I'm not pretending to have invented investment analysis. What I did was something specific:
I used AI — the same force that's reshuffling every industry — to build an analysis engine that models the reshuffling itself.
Traditional analysts are stuck in a structural bind:
None of that makes them wrong or dumb. It makes them structurally constrained for exactly this kind of moment.
My engine doesn't have a boss asking for a quarterly call. It doesn't have a coverage silo. It doesn't have a 12-month evaluation window. It tracks 28 industries across 8 analytical dimensions with 167 cross-sector effects over five timeframes from 1 year to 10 years.
Is it perfect? No. But it was built for this.
A 20,000-word companion report that answers the most dangerous question in investing:
"If this expert was right last time, why should I doubt them now?"
You'll discover:
This report could save you from making a catastrophic portfolio decision based on some "oracle" who got lucky once and now has a reputation to protect.
It's yours free with the 28-Sector AI Playbook.
I'll be straight with you.
I built an AI disruption engine that models 28 industries across 8 analytical dimensions with 167 cross-sector effects. It calculates Relative Valuation Scores across five timeframes. It runs what-if scenarios. It's at aistockmarketimpacts.com and it costs $279 a year.
This book is a sample of what that engine produces.
I figure if you read 23,000 words of our research and think "this person actually knows what they're talking about" — some percentage of you will want the live engine, the monthly updates, and the scenario modeling that the subscription includes.
And if you don't? You still got a damn good book for twenty-seven dollars.
I'd rather have 10,000 people reading my research at $27 than 100 people wondering whether $279 is worth it.
That's the whole strategy. No tricks.
THE 28-SECTOR AI PLAYBOOK
23,000+ words • 27 chapters • 28 industries analyzed
167 cross-effects mapped • Year-by-year timelines
Complete scoring for every industry
PLUS FREE BONUS:
The Guru Trap: Why the Smartest Predictors Get the Next One Wrong
(20,000 words • 10 chapters • 50-Year Doom Scorecard)
Total value: $54
Your price today:
$27
Instant PDF download. Both books. Keep forever.
Secure payment via Stripe. Instant delivery.
Read both books. If the 28-Sector AI Playbook doesn't give you at least one investment insight that changes how you think about your portfolio, email me and I'll refund every penny. No questions. No hassle. You keep the books either way.
This book is for self-directed investors who call their own shots.
People who:
This is NOT for people who want stock tips. We don't do stock tips. We model the structural forces that move entire sectors — and let you make your own decisions like a grown adult.
For $27, you get:
Bloomberg Terminal: $24,000/yr.
Goldman Sachs sector report: not for sale to you at any price.
This: $27.
GET BOTH BOOKS NOW — $27To your portfolio,
Scott Covert
AI-Stocks Intelligence
aistockmarketimpacts.com
P.S. — One free insight from the book: The three industries with the highest velocity scores in our model are Cloud Platforms (0.95), Chip Design (0.95), and Enterprise SaaS (0.92). The three with the highest resistance are Biotech-AI (0.90), Big Pharma (0.90), and Healthcare (0.85). High velocity + low resistance = immediate repricing. High velocity + high resistance = opportunity window where the market hasn't priced in the disruption yet. Think about what that means for your portfolio right now.
P.P.S. — The free Guru Trap bonus documents every major doom prediction since 1978 — gold bugs, Black Monday, Y2K, peak oil, Burry, Roubini, all of them — and shows exactly why the "smartest" predictors keep getting the next one wrong. Same structural constraints we talked about above, applied to the guru industry. If you've ever made a portfolio move because some famous analyst screamed about a crash... this is required reading.
P.P.P.S. — The guarantee. If the Playbook doesn't give you at least one insight that changes how you think about your portfolio, you get your $27 back and keep both books. I literally cannot make this more risk-free without paying you to read it.
Disclaimer: This report is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or a solicitation to buy or sell any security. The analysis represents opinions based on publicly available data and proprietary modeling. Past performance does not guarantee future results. AI industry projections involve substantial uncertainty. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The author may hold positions in securities mentioned in this report.
© 2026 AI-Stocks Intelligence. All rights reserved.